?

Log in

 
 
12 November 2007 @ 07:51 pm
[ dva ]  
 
 
 
After Always: a bit surprised.a_fter on November 13th, 2007 01:25 am (UTC)
I always forget just how bad that one is.

It's a strong illusion, isn't it?
[Q] uiet.: defragmentationqiew on November 13th, 2007 01:31 am (UTC)
Yes. Some are
More suseptable.
After Always: vaguely interested.a_fter on November 13th, 2007 01:33 am (UTC)
Apparently I'm fairly weak in that regard. The first time I saw it, I swore it was animated.
[Q] uiet.: I am over hereqiew on November 13th, 2007 03:24 am (UTC)
Not bad.

Can you stop them?
After Always: vaguely interested.a_fter on November 13th, 2007 03:26 am (UTC)
Yes. If I unfocus my eyes, they at the least slow dramatically and usually stop.
[Q] uiet.: Insideqiew on November 13th, 2007 03:30 am (UTC)
unfocus?
After Always: vaguely interested.a_fter on November 13th, 2007 03:33 am (UTC)
Mmm... After trying, intense focus seems to work better. I don't know how unfocusing was working. Maybe I was hallucinating?
[Q] uiet.: HypnotiQqiew on November 13th, 2007 03:45 am (UTC)
Natural eyes wonder
propells illusion
stop wonderings brain
slows process
images dull.

Increased focus, open mind
Illusion is fooled
by you.
After Always: warm smile.a_fter on November 13th, 2007 03:47 am (UTC)
Ah, that makes sense! Very interesting.

Thank you.
v_illainy: confusedv_illainy on November 13th, 2007 01:26 am (UTC)
ugh... they're all moving

And It's a regular picture file.

Too bad the ad in the middle ruins it.

Interesting.
[Q] uiet.: I am dissimilatedqiew on November 13th, 2007 01:29 am (UTC)
. . .
Backup: how we wither in the shade.b_efore on November 13th, 2007 01:29 am (UTC)
Oh god.

I am going to vomit. My eyes...
[Q] uiet.qiew on November 13th, 2007 01:46 am (UTC)
Backup: i can't sleep.b_efore on November 13th, 2007 01:51 am (UTC)
That one is not so bad.
[Q] uiet.: internal circuit-circusqiew on November 13th, 2007 02:21 am (UTC)
What do you see?
Backup: i can't sleep.b_efore on November 13th, 2007 02:33 am (UTC)
I can't look at it. It makes me feel sick.
K: Oh!k_ings on November 13th, 2007 01:34 am (UTC)
Are they supposed to be snakes?
Evidence Edge [E]: dans un livrelabyrinthedge on November 13th, 2007 01:41 am (UTC)
They're very odd snakes, if they are.

Excuse me, but do you mind if I print out a copy of this, Q?
[Q] uiet.: Insideqiew on November 13th, 2007 01:44 am (UTC)
Enjoy.
Evidence Edge [E]: tomberailabyrinthedge on November 13th, 2007 01:45 am (UTC)
Merci.
Kk_ings on November 13th, 2007 01:53 am (UTC)
I agree. A lot of them are missing tongues, too.
[Q] uiet.: withinqiew on November 13th, 2007 02:02 am (UTC)
The point is not their form
but their ability.
Kk_ings on November 13th, 2007 02:09 am (UTC)
Haha, Yeah, they're good at that, but they're not very good at being snakes.
[Q] uiet.qiew on November 13th, 2007 02:24 am (UTC)
No, not good
snakes face looks
like bug eyes.
K: Hahak_ings on November 13th, 2007 02:33 am (UTC)
Hmm, maybe some of them are bugs, then? The bugs and the snakes are living together to make optical illusions.
[Q] uiet.qiew on November 13th, 2007 03:25 am (UTC)
[Holy crap he vaguely smiled at this]
K: Hahak_ings on November 13th, 2007 03:28 am (UTC)
[Q] uiet.: Outward Inverse Obscurityqiew on November 13th, 2007 01:43 am (UTC)
Yes.
X (24): X [24]flu_x on November 13th, 2007 02:16 am (UTC)
Optical illusions are very interesting. (The red forked strips remind me of snake tongues.) I always got befuddled with the elephant picture myself. (Incomplete; -2)
[Q] uiet.: internal circuit-circusqiew on November 13th, 2007 02:43 am (UTC)
X (24): mmmm [4]flu_x on November 13th, 2007 02:46 am (UTC)
I get six! (Even, good.) Though I may be missing one, I don't know. (Incomplete; -2)
[Q] uiet.: defragmentationqiew on November 13th, 2007 02:55 am (UTC)
Not quite half.
X (24): mmmm [4]flu_x on November 13th, 2007 03:01 am (UTC)
Mm, 12? Though I want to say 14 due to the men riding horses, haha. (Incomplete; -3)
[Q] uiet.: I am over hereqiew on November 13th, 2007 03:06 am (UTC)
13. 14 with man on horse.
Only one man. Other is
stuck.


Maybe.
d_ecay on November 13th, 2007 02:22 am (UTC)
Can you post something worth posting?
[Q] uiet.: HypnotiQqiew on November 13th, 2007 02:27 am (UTC)
must be
smart but comments
worthless space.
d_ecay on November 13th, 2007 02:28 am (UTC)
Guess that doesn't counter-balance the worthlessness of which you seem to think as enlightening.
[Q] uiet.: I am over hereqiew on November 13th, 2007 02:31 am (UTC)
Is that what
I think?

Doctor, anatomist, psychic.
Good start.
d_ecay on November 13th, 2007 02:37 am (UTC)
Cannot compare to a fool like you.
[Q] uiet.qiew on November 13th, 2007 02:41 am (UTC)
Cannot be argued.
Light Yagami: [pleased] Under Goldunder_lights on November 14th, 2007 03:58 am (UTC)
Ooh, I like this picture! Pictures are no good if they don't even move, you know, there's no sense in something that exists without movement.
[Q] uiet.qiew on November 14th, 2007 11:46 am (UTC)
[ ;o! U! ;D
Iiiinteresting says the Q, of course he doesn't say this though >> ]